1993 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1993Overall Score52.5/100
1993 Geo Storm vs 1994 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.4i (90 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Geo Storm
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Combo
GeoMakeOpel
StormModelCombo
1993Model year1994
CoupeBody typePick-up
4Seats2
2Doors3
Performance
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Combo
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1389 cc
130 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank0 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Combo
4150 mmLength4230 mm
1695 mmWidth1686 mm
1300 mmHeight1805 mm
1010 KgWeight—
2450 mmWheelbase2480 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Geo Storm and 1994 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…