1993 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1993Overall Score52.5/100
1993 Geo Storm vs 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Mitsubishi
Space Runner
Mitsubishi Space Runner 1.8 4x4 (N21W) 1993Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Space Runner
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
GeoMakeMitsubishi
StormModelSpace Runner
1993Model year1993
CoupeBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
12,4 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
130 HPPower122 HP
0 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
4150 mmLength4270 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1300 mmHeight1680 mm
1010 KgWeight1315 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2520 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Geo Storm and 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…