1993 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1993Overall Score52.5/100
1993 Geo Storm vs 1993 Mazda MX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Mazda
MX-3
Mazda MX-3 1.6 16V (105 Hp) 1993Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-3
GeoMakeMazda
StormModelMX-3
1993Model year1993
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats2+2
2Doors2
Performance
Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-3
12,4 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
200 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
130 HPPower105 HP
0 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption9 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-3
4150 mmLength4220 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1300 mmHeight1310 mm
1010 KgWeight1060 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2455 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Geo Storm and 1993 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…