DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Geo Storm vs 1991 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 323
GeoMakeMazda
StormModel323
1991Model year1991
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 323
12,4 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
130 HPPower103 HP
0 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears—
205/50 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 323
4150 mmLength4260 mm
1695 mmWidth1680 mm
1300 mmHeight1340 mm
1010 KgWeight1120 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Geo Storm and 1991 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…