1996 • Geo
Metro
Geo Metro 1.3 (70 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Geo Metro vs 1998 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.8 Turbo DI (90 Hp) 1998Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo MetroSpecificationFord Focus
GeoMakeFord
MetroModelFocus
1996Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Geo MetroSpecificationFord Focus
—0–100 km/h14,9 s
0 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1298 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
70 HPPower90 HP
100 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo MetroSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption6,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo MetroSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
125/80 R13Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Geo MetroSpecificationFord Focus
4166 mmLength4362 mm
1590 mmWidth1698 mm
1407 mmHeight1430 mm
826 KgWeight1205 Kg
—Wheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Geo Metro and 1998 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…