DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Geo Metro vs 1992 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo MetroSpecificationGeo Storm
GeoMakeGeo
MetroModelStorm
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

Geo MetroSpecificationGeo Storm
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1298 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
70 HPPower130 HP
100 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo MetroSpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Geo MetroSpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
125/80 R13Tyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Geo MetroSpecificationGeo Storm
3795 mmLength4150 mm
1575 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1300 mm
826 KgWeight1010 Kg
2365 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Geo Metro and 1992 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…