DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GAZ 31 vs 2000 Nissan Largo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationNissan Largo
GAZMakeNissan
31ModelLargo
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationNissan Largo
12,9 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2465 ccEngine displacement2388 cc
155 HPPower145 HP
216 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationNissan Largo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,67 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationNissan Largo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationNissan Largo
4897 mmLength4610 mm
1840 mmWidth1745 mm
1472 mmHeight1905 mm
1550 KgWeight1620 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GAZ 31 and 2000 Nissan Largo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…