DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GAZ 31 vs 2000 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

60.25–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeLand Rover
31ModelDiscovery
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
180 km/hTop speed157 km/h
2465 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
155 HPPower136 HP
216 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4897 mmLength4710 mm
1840 mmWidth1860 mm
1472 mmHeight1890 mm
1550 KgWeight2020 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GAZ 31 and 2000 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…