DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 GAZ 31 vs 2004 SsangYong Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeSsangYong
31ModelMusso
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
180 km/hTop speed176 km/h
2464 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
198 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption16,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4897 mmLength4640 mm
1840 mmWidth1864 mm
1472 mmHeight1735 mm
1550 KgWeight1895 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 GAZ 31 and 2004 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…