DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GAZ 31 vs 2003 Nissan Terrano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeNissan
31ModelTerrano
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
180 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2464 ccEngine displacement2663 cc
136 HPPower125 HP
198 NmTorque278 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4897 mmLength4665 mm
1840 mmWidth1755 mm
1472 mmHeight1850 mm
1550 KgWeight1875 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GAZ 31 and 2003 Nissan Terrano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…