DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 GAZ 31 vs 2002 Brilliance M1 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M1

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationBrilliance M1
GAZMakeBrilliance
31ModelM1
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationBrilliance M1
15,3 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
155 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2134 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
114 HPPower129 HP
255 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationBrilliance M1
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank74 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationBrilliance M1
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationBrilliance M1
4897 mmLength4880 mm
1840 mmWidth1800 mm
1472 mmHeight1450 mm
1550 KgWeight1420 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 GAZ 31 and 2002 Brilliance M1 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M1 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…