DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 GAZ 31 vs 2002 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeRenault
31ModelScenic
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
155 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2134 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
114 HPPower140 HP
255 NmTorque189 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4897 mmLength4425 mm
1840 mmWidth1775 mm
1472 mmHeight1720 mm
1550 KgWeight1465 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 GAZ 31 and 2002 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…