E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 GAZ 31 vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
GAZMakeGAZ
31Model31
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
23,0 s0–100 km/h23,0 s
135 km/hTop speed135 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
172 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
4870 mmLength4870 mm
1800 mmWidth1800 mm
1422 mmHeight1422 mm
1401 KgWeight1401 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 GAZ 31 and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVSImage unavailableGAZ 31 vs GAZ 312000 and 1999 model years2000 Opel CampoVSImage unavailableOpel Campo vs GAZ 312000 and 1999 model years1999 Kia SportageVSImage unavailableKia Sportage vs GAZ 311999 and 1999 model years2000 Daewoo KorandoVSImage unavailableDaewoo Korando vs GAZ 312000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableSsangYong Korando vs GAZ 312000 and 1999 model years

Comments are loading…