DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 GAZ 31 vs 2002 Daewoo Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
GAZMakeDaewoo
31ModelMusso
1999Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
23,0 s0–100 km/h21,0 s
135 km/hTop speed143 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2874 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
172 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
4870 mmLength4640 mm
1800 mmWidth1864 mm
1422 mmHeight1735 mm
1401 KgWeight1815 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 GAZ 31 and 2002 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…