DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 GAZ 31 vs 2000 SsangYong Korando Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Korando

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeSsangYong
31ModelKorando
1997Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

23,0 s0–100 km/h25,0 s
135 km/hTop speed130 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2299 cc
90 HPPower80 HP
172 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength4330 mm
1800 mmWidth1841 mm
1422 mmHeight1940 mm
1401 KgWeight1740 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 GAZ 31 and 2000 SsangYong Korando approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Korando leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…