DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GAZ 31 vs 2003 Mazda Premacy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Premacy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Premacy
GAZMakeMazda
31ModelPremacy
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Premacy
15,3 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
155 km/hTop speed188 km/h
2134 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
110 HPPower131 HP
250 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Premacy
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Premacy
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Premacy
4870 mmLength4340 mm
1800 mmWidth1710 mm
1422 mmHeight1570 mm
1560 KgWeight1310 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GAZ 31 and 2003 Mazda Premacy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Premacy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…