DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 GAZ 31 vs 2009 Great Wall Wingle Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Wingle

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.5–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeGreat Wall
31ModelWingle
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

19,0 s0–100 km/h28,0 s
147 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
90 HPPower95 HP
174 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4960 mmLength5040 mm
1800 mmWidth1800 mm
1422 mmHeight1730 mm
1450 KgWeight1860 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase3050 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 GAZ 31 and 2009 Great Wall Wingle approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Wingle leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…