DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 GAZ 31 vs 2006 Great Wall Hover CUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.5–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeGreat Wall
31ModelHover CUV
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

19,0 s0–100 km/h28,0 s
147 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
90 HPPower95 HP
174 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank74 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4960 mmLength4620 mm
1800 mmWidth1800 mm
1422 mmHeight1775 mm
1450 KgWeight1840 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 GAZ 31 and 2006 Great Wall Hover CUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…