DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 GAZ 31 vs 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

45.5–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeMitsubishi
31ModelSpace Runner
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

19,0 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
147 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
100 HPPower82 HP
182 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
15 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4960 mmLength4270 mm
1800 mmWidth1695 mm
1422 mmHeight1665 mm
1450 KgWeight1260 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 GAZ 31 and 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…