DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 GAZ 31 vs 2000 Opel Campo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Campo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
GAZMakeOpel
31ModelCampo
1997Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
22,0 s0–100 km/h23,4 s
140 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
81 HPPower76 HP
167 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption—
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
4960 mmLength4980 mm
1800 mmWidth1690 mm
1422 mmHeight1710 mm
1540 KgWeight—
2800 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 GAZ 31 and 2000 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…