E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 GAZ 31 vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
GAZMakeGAZ
31Model31
1997Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
22,0 s0–100 km/h22,0 s
140 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
81 HPPower81 HP
167 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption15,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationGAZ 31
4960 mmLength4960 mm
1800 mmWidth1800 mm
1422 mmHeight1422 mm
1540 KgWeight1540 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 GAZ 31 and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1997 Kia SportageVSImage unavailableKia Sportage vs GAZ 311997 and 1997 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableGAZ 31 vs GAZ 312000 and 1997 model years2000 Opel CampoVSImage unavailableOpel Campo vs GAZ 312000 and 1997 model years2000 Daewoo KorandoVSImage unavailableDaewoo Korando vs GAZ 312000 and 1997 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableSsangYong Korando vs GAZ 312000 and 1997 model years

Comments are loading…