1996 • Ford
Windstar
Ford Windstar 3.8 V6 GL (155 Hp) 1996Overall Score68.25/100
1996 Ford Windstar vs 1996 Mercury Cougar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mercury
Cougar
Mercury Cougar 1996Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Ford Windstar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford WindstarSpecificationMercury Cougar
FordMakeMercury
WindstarModelCougar
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody type—
7Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Ford WindstarSpecificationMercury Cougar
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
155 HPPower220 HP
298 NmTorque292 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford WindstarSpecificationMercury Cougar
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
4Gears—
205/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford WindstarSpecificationMercury Cougar
5162 mmLength—
1915 mmWidth—
1789 mmHeight—
1693 KgWeight—
2693 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Windstar and 1996 Mercury Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSHolden Commodore vs Ford Windstar1996 and 1996 model years
VSHolden Statesman vs Ford Windstar1996 and 1996 model yearsVSMercury Cougar vs Ford Windstar1996 and 1996 model yearsImage unavailableVSFord F-150 vs Ford Windstar1996 and 1996 model years
VSBuick Regal vs Ford Windstar1997 and 1996 model yearsComments are loading…