DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Windstar vs 1996 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
WindstarModelCommodore
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
165 km/hTop speed195 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
155 HPPower200 HP
298 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5162 mmLength4861 mm
1915 mmWidth1794 mm
1789 mmHeight1448 mm
1693 KgWeight1370 Kg
2693 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Windstar and 1996 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…