2000 • Ford
Windstar
Ford Windstar 3.8 V6 (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score74.5/100
2000 Ford Windstar vs 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Land Cruiser
Toyota Land Cruiser 4.2 D (204 Hp) 2000Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Ford Windstar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford WindstarSpecificationToyota Land Cruiser
FordMakeToyota
WindstarModelLand Cruiser
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats8
4Doors5
Performance
Ford WindstarSpecificationToyota Land Cruiser
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement4164 cc
203 HPPower204 HP
326 NmTorque430 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford WindstarSpecificationToyota Land Cruiser
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
95 ltFuel tank95 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford WindstarSpecificationToyota Land Cruiser
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size275/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford WindstarSpecificationToyota Land Cruiser
5125 mmLength4890 mm
1915 mmWidth1940 mm
1790 mmHeight1890 mm
1690 KgWeight—
3066 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Windstar and 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…