DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Windstar vs 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeAlfa Romeo
WindstarModel164
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
180 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
152 HPPower125 HP
252 NmTorque288 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
95 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5125 mmLength4565 mm
1915 mmWidth1760 mm
1790 mmHeight1390 mm
1810 KgWeight1490 Kg
3066 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Windstar and 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…