DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Tourneo Connect vs 2003 Renault Symbol Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tourneo Connect

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.

49.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
Tourneo ConnectModelSymbol
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

16,3 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
155 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
220 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4278 mmLength4171 mm
1795 mmWidth1639 mm
1814 mmHeight1437 mm
1490 KgWeight950 Kg
2664 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Tourneo Connect and 2003 Renault Symbol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tourneo Connect leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…