DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Tourneo Connect vs 2006 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tourneo Connect

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

66.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeOpel
Tourneo ConnectModelAntara
2005Model year2006
MinivanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
165 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement2405 cc
115 HPPower150 HP
160 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption13,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size225/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4278 mmLength4575 mm
1795 mmWidth1850 mm
1814 mmHeight1704 mm
1425 KgWeight—
2664 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Tourneo Connect and 2006 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tourneo Connect leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…