DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1985 Ford Thunderbird vs 1985 Audi 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Thunderbird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeAudi
ThunderbirdModel200
1985Model year1985
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

235 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
140 HPPower137 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R15

Dimensions

5133 mmLength4807 mm
1806 mmWidth1814 mm
1356 mmHeight1422 mm
—Weight1290 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1985 Ford Thunderbird and 1985 Audi 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Thunderbird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…