DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Thunderbird vs 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Land Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.75–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeToyota
ThunderbirdModelLand Cruiser
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4477 cc
208 HPPower205 HP
380 NmTorque360 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank95 lt
19 ltUrban consumption—
11 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,5 ltAverage consumption17 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/50/R16Tyre size275/70 R16 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5088 mmLength4820 mm
1847 mmWidth1930 mm
1333 mmHeight1890 mm
1687 KgWeight2410 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Thunderbird and 1996 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…