DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford Thunderbird vs 2004 Chrysler Pacifica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Pacifica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChrysler
ThunderbirdModelPacifica
2006Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3952 cc
283 HPPower256 HP
388 NmTorque355 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank87 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
—Average consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size235/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength5052 mm
1829 mmWidth2013 mm
1323 mmHeight1735 mm
1748 KgWeight2064 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2954 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford Thunderbird and 2004 Chrysler Pacifica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Pacifica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…