DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Thunderbird vs 2005 Buick Rainer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Rainer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeBuick
ThunderbirdModelRainer
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
220 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement4157 cc
283 HPPower279 HP
388 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/50 R17Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4871 mm
1829 mmWidth1894 mm
1323 mmHeight1894 mm
1748 KgWeight2065 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2869 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Thunderbird and 2005 Buick Rainer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Rainer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…