DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Thunderbird vs 2005 Chevrolet Trailblazer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trailblazer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChevrolet
ThunderbirdModelTrailblazer
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
220 km/hTop speed192 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement4157 cc
283 HPPower279 HP
388 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank71 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
—Average consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/50 R17Tyre size245/70 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4872 mm
1829 mmWidth1895 mm
1323 mmHeight1892 mm
1748 KgWeight2015 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Thunderbird and 2005 Chevrolet Trailblazer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trailblazer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…