DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Ford Thunderbird vs 1989 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Thunderbird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeBuick
ThunderbirdModelRegal
1989Model year1989
CoupeBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
141 HPPower173 HP
292 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
12 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4 Hydramatic
205/70 R15 HTyre size205/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5088 mmLength4917 mm
1847 mmWidth1842 mm
1333 mmHeight1346 mm
1619 KgWeight1498 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Ford Thunderbird and 1989 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Thunderbird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…