1995 • Ford
Tempo
Ford Tempo 2.3 (99 Hp) 1995Overall Score58.25/100
1995 Ford Tempo vs 1995 Chevrolet Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Chevrolet
Omega
Chevrolet Omega 2.2 i GLX (116 Hp) 1995Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TempoSpecificationChevrolet Omega
FordMakeChevrolet
TempoModelOmega
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TempoSpecificationChevrolet Omega
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2307 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
99 HPPower116 HP
168 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TempoSpecificationChevrolet Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TempoSpecificationChevrolet Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TempoSpecificationChevrolet Omega
4490 mmLength4738 mm
1735 mmWidth1760 mm
1340 mmHeight1418 mm
1175 KgWeight1350 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Ford Tempo and 1995 Chevrolet Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…