1995 • Ford
Tempo
Ford Tempo 2.3 (102 Hp) 1995Overall Score62.25/100
1995 Ford Tempo vs 1995 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.5 TD 4X4 (90 Hp) 1995Overall Score61.25/100
WINNER
Ford Tempo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
FordMakeMitsubishi
TempoModelL 200
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
160 km/hTop speed152 km/h
2307 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
102 HPPower90 HP
176 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
4490 mmLength4500 mm
1735 mmWidth1655 mm
1340 mmHeight1570 mm
1180 KgWeight1820 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Ford Tempo and 1995 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…