1993 • Ford
Tempo
Ford Tempo 2.3 (102 Hp) 1993Overall Score62.25/100
1993 Ford Tempo vs 1993 Mitsubishi Delica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Mitsubishi
Delica
Mitsubishi Delica 2.5 TD (105 Hp) 1993Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Ford Tempo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
FordMakeMitsubishi
TempoModelDelica
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2307 ccEngine displacement2476 cc
102 HPPower105 HP
176 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford TempoSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
4490 mmLength4595 mm
1735 mmWidth1695 mm
1340 mmHeight1950 mm
1180 KgWeight1710 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Ford Tempo and 1993 Mitsubishi Delica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…