DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Taurus vs 1996 Pontiac Montana Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Montana

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakePontiac
TaurusModelMontana
1995Model year1996
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed178 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
141 HPPower186 HP
292 NmTorque284 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/70 R14Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4877 mmLength4755 mm
1808 mmWidth1830 mm
1374 mmHeight1710 mm
1420 KgWeight1770 Kg
2692 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Taurus and 1996 Pontiac Montana approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Montana leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…