2016 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.5 V6 24V (288 Hp) 2016Overall Score80.75/100
2016 Ford Taurus vs 2014 SsangYong Chairman Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • SsangYong
Chairman
SsangYong Chairman 3.2 i 24V (220 Hp) 2014Overall Score79.75/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
80.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationSsangYong Chairman
FordMakeSsangYong
TaurusModelChairman
2016Model year2014
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationSsangYong Chairman
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
288 HPPower220 HP
344 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationSsangYong Chairman
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption17,1 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,8 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationSsangYong Chairman
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 SelectShiftGears4
255/45 R19Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationSsangYong Chairman
5154 mmLength5355 mm
1935 mmWidth1825 mm
1542 mmHeight1475 mm
1800 KgWeight1750 Kg
2868 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Taurus and 2014 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…