DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Taurus vs 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
TaurusModelChallenger
1995Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
223 HPPower185 HP
271 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4877 mmLength4530 mm
1808 mmWidth1775 mm
1374 mmHeight1730 mm
1501 KgWeight1830 Kg
2692 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Taurus and 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…