DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Taurus vs 2002 Nissan Safari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
TaurusModelSafari
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
200 HPPower170 HP
271 NmTorque363 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption10,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size265/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5019 mmLength4340 mm
1854 mmWidth1930 mm
1425 mmHeight1855 mm
1530 KgWeight2130 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Taurus and 2002 Nissan Safari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…