2002 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 24V (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
2002 Ford Taurus vs 2002 Mercury Sable Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 V6 (157 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationMercury Sable
FordMakeMercury
TaurusModelSable
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationMercury Sable
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
200 HPPower157 HP
271 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationMercury Sable
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationMercury Sable
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationMercury Sable
5019 mmLength5070 mm
1854 mmWidth1850 mm
1425 mmHeight1410 mm
1530 KgWeight1515 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Taurus and 2002 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…