2002 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 24V (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
2002 Ford Taurus vs 2002 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 2.9 TD 24V (177 Hp) 2002Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
FordMakeLand Rover
TaurusModelRange Rover
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
—0–100 km/h13,6 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
200 HPPower177 HP
271 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption14,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
5019 mmLength4950 mm
1854 mmWidth1955 mm
1425 mmHeight1860 mm
1530 KgWeight2500 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Taurus and 2002 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…