1996 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 24V (200 Hp) 1996Overall Score64.5/100
1996 Ford Taurus vs 1996 Ford Aerostar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1996Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationFord Aerostar
FordMakeFord
TaurusModelAerostar
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationFord Aerostar
10,1 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
200 HPPower147 HP
271 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationFord Aerostar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank79 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationFord Aerostar
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/75 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationFord Aerostar
5016 mmLength4440 mm
1854 mmWidth1820 mm
1400 mmHeight1850 mm
1522 KgWeight1530 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase3020 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Taurus and 1996 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…