2003 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 (155 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Ford Taurus vs 2003 Kia Carnival Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Kia
Carnival
Kia Carnival 2.9 CRDI (144 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationKia Carnival
FordMakeKia
TaurusModelCarnival
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationKia Carnival
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2902 cc
155 HPPower144 HP
251 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationKia Carnival
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationKia Carnival
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationKia Carnival
5019 mmLength4925 mm
1854 mmWidth1900 mm
1425 mmHeight1735 mm
1521 KgWeight2078 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2905 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Taurus and 2003 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…