1982 • Ford
Sierra
Ford Sierra 2.8 XR4i (143 Hp) 1982Overall Score61.5/100
1982 Ford Sierra vs 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1982 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 2.5 i (106 Hp) 1982Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford SierraSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
FordMakeOldsmobile
SierraModelCutlass
1982Model year1982
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Ford SierraSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
143 HPPower106 HP
216 NmTorque183 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford SierraSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford SierraSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
—Tyre size185/75 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford SierraSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4425 mmLength4835 mm
1694 mmWidth1765 mm
1407 mmHeight1375 mm
—Weight1275 Kg
2608 mmWheelbase2665 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1982 Ford Sierra and 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…