DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Ford Sierra vs 1992 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCitroen
SierraModelXM
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
195 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
125 HPPower121 HP
177 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4467 mmLength4710 mm
1698 mmWidth1795 mm
1407 mmHeight1385 mm
1200 KgWeight1310 Kg
2608 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Ford Sierra and 1992 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…