1989 • Ford
Sierra
Ford Sierra 2.0i (101 Hp) 1989Overall Score55.5/100
1989 Ford Sierra vs 1989 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1989 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.1 TD 12V (110 Hp) 1989Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Citroen XM
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford SierraSpecificationCitroen XM
FordMakeCitroen
SierraModelXM
1989Model year1989
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford SierraSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1993 ccEngine displacement2088 cc
101 HPPower110 HP
148 NmTorque243 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford SierraSpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford SierraSpecificationCitroen XM
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford SierraSpecificationCitroen XM
4425 mmLength4710 mm
1694 mmWidth1795 mm
1407 mmHeight1385 mm
—Weight1380 Kg
2608 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1989 Ford Sierra and 1989 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…