1992 • Ford
Sierra
Ford Sierra 2.0 (105 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.5/100
1992 Ford Sierra vs 1992 Mazda Cronos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0 D (82 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Ford Sierra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford SierraSpecificationMazda Cronos
FordMakeMazda
SierraModelCronos
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford SierraSpecificationMazda Cronos
0 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1993 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
105 HPPower82 HP
157 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford SierraSpecificationMazda Cronos
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford SierraSpecificationMazda Cronos
4425 mmLength4695 mm
1694 mmWidth1770 mm
1407 mmHeight1400 mm
—Weight1260 Kg
2608 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Ford Sierra and 1992 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…