DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1983 Ford Sierra vs 1983 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.5–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeToyota
SierraModel4runner
1983Model year1983
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2366 cc
105 HPPower97 HP
0 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4435 mm
1694 mmWidth1689 mm
1407 mmHeight1679 mm
1600 KgWeight—
2608 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1983 Ford Sierra and 1983 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…