2013 • Ford
S-Max
Ford S-Max 2.2 Duratorq TDCi (200 Hp) 2013Overall Score54.25/100
2013 Ford S-Max vs 2013 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max Grand 2.0 Duratorq TDCi (140 Hp) 2013Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Ford S-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford S-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
FordMakeFord
S-MaxModelC-Max
2013Model year2013
MPVBody typeMPV
7Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Ford S-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
8,6 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
215 km/hTop speed200 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
200 HPPower140 HP
0 NmTorque320 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Ford S-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford S-MaxSpecificationFord C-Max
4903 mmLength4520 mm
2154 mmWidth1828 mm
1660 mmHeight1684 mm
1734 KgWeight1575 Kg
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Ford S-Max and 2013 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford S-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…